This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0093650208315977v1 35/4/452    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Rojas, H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Strategy Versus Understanding: How Orientations Toward Political Conversation Influence Political Engagement

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hrojas{at}wisc.edu.

	Abstract

This study combines empirical political communication research models with theoretical accounts provided by the theory of communicative action to expand the understanding of how communication matters for democratic political functioning, particularly under conditions of social instability. Building on the Habermasian distinction between strategic orientations versus understanding orientations in conversation, the author explores the role of conversation orientations as antecedents to political engagement. Examination of conversation orientations in Colombia, a society characterized by social conflict, provides evidence of the democratic benefits of orientations toward reaching understanding and the deleterious effects of strategic orientations for political involvement, associational membership, and ultimately participation, as well as the importance of including conversation orientations as explanatory factors in models that seek to explain political involvement. These findings speak to the potential for communicative rationality to transcend the use of force and bring about action coordination based on understanding in communities experiencing civil strife.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?