This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McLeod, J. M. Articles by Byrnes, J. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Another Look At the Agenda-Setting Function of the Press

University of Wisconsin

Lee B. Becker

University of Wisconsin

James E. Byrnes

University of Wisconsin

The agenda-setting hypothesis asserts that the media have an effect indirectly by choosing certain issues for emphasis, thus making those issues more salient to the audiences. The hypothesis, stated in such general terms, presents formidable conceptual and methodological difficulties that are dealt with in this article. A controlled study of the audiences of two newspapers with differing content emphases was conducted during the 1972 presidential campaign. The results show only moderate support for the agenda-setting hypothesis; the honesty in government issues, given heavy play in one of the two newspapers, failed to generate much enthusiasm among readers of either paper. In addition the results suggest agenda setting is not a broad and unqualified media effect. Predicted differences mainly were restricted to the less involved and less motivated partisans who were heavily dependent on the newspapers for their political news. Finally, the importance of studying issue saliences apart from political attitudes was illustrated by the relatively strong relationship between such saliences and voter turnout and direction.

Communication Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 131-166 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/009365027400100201


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Huck, O. Quiring, and H.-B. Brosius Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 139 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Baumgartner Humor on the Next Frontier: Youth, Online Political Humor, and the JibJab Effect Social Science Computer Review, August 1, 2007; 25(3): 319 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Min, S. I. Ghanem, and D. Evatt Using A Split-ballot Survey to Explore the Robustness of the 'MIP' Question in Agenda-Setting Research: A Methodological Study Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2007; 19(2): 221 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Schoenbach, E. de Waal, and E. Lauf Research Note: Online and Print Newspapers: Their Impact on the Extent of the Perceived Public Agenda European Journal of Communication, June 1, 2005; 20(2): 245 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Besley and J. Shanahan Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology Science Communication, June 1, 2005; 26(4): 347 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Kwak, A. E. Williams, X. Wang, and H. Lee Talking Politics and Engaging Politics:: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement Communication Research, February 1, 2005; 32(1): 87 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Schoenbach and E. Lauf The "Trap" Effect of Television and Its Competitors Communication Research, October 1, 2002; 29(5): 564 - 583. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Roberts, W. Wanta, and T.-H. Dzwo Agenda Setting and Issue Salience Online Communication Research, August 1, 2002; 29(4): 452 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Althaus and D. Tewksbury Agenda Setting and the "New" News: Patterns of Issue Importance Among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of the New York Times Communication Research, April 1, 2002; 29(2): 180 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. A. MORTON and J. M. DUCK Communication and Health Beliefs: Mass and Interpersonal Influences on Perceptions of Risk to Self and Others Communication Research, October 1, 2001; 28(5): 602 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. H. WEAVER What Voters Learn from Media The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, July 1, 1996; 546(1): 34 - 47. [Abstract]

				P. Palmgreen and J.D. Rayburn Uses and Gratifications and Exposure To Public Television: A Discrepancy Approach Communication Research, April 1, 1979; 6(2): 155 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. Blumler The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies Communication Research, January 1, 1979; 6(1): 9 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. E. Lometti, B. Reeves, and C. R. Bybee Investigating the Assumptions of Uses and Gratifications Research Communication Research, July 1, 1977; 4(3): 321 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. McLeod, J. D. Brown, L. B. Becker, and D. A. Ziemke Decline and Fall At the White House: A Longitudinal Analysis of Communication Effects Communication Research, January 1, 1977; 4(1): 3 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. McLeod, J. D. Brown, L. B. Becker, and D. A. Ziemke Decline and Fall at the White House: A Rejoinder to Professor Davis Communication Research, January 1, 1977; 4(1): 35 - 39. [PDF]

				S.J. Ball-Rokeach and M.L. DeFleur A Dependency Model of Mass-Media Effects Communication Research, January 1, 1976; 3(1): 3 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Ray and S. Ward The Relevance of Consumer Information Processing Studies to Communication Research Communication Research, July 1, 1975; 2(3): 195 - 202. [PDF]

				S. Kraus and S. H. Chaffee The Ervin Committee Hearings and Communication Research Communication Research, October 1, 1974; 1(4): 339 - 344. [PDF]