Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Learn about Basics of Communication

Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FULK, J.
Right arrow Articles by POWER, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations

JANET FULK

CHARLES W. STEINFIELD

JOSEPH SCHMITZ

J. GERARD POWER

This article presents a model of how social influence processes affect individuals' attitudes toward communication media and media use behavior. The model integrates two areas of research. One body of work posits that media use patterns are the outcome of objectively rational choices. These choices involve evaluating communication options and selecting an appropriate medium to match the communication requirements of the task. The second perspective is social information processing theory (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). This approach proposes that attitudes and behaviors are partially determined by information embedded in the social context. The synthesis of these perspectives asserts that media characteristics and attitudes are in part socially constructed. Furthermore, attitudes are influenced by attributions based on observations of one's own past behavior. This model is shown to explain a wider range of existing empirical findings. Also, new propositions are derived to guide future research. This social construction model of media use has significant implications for the design, conduct, and reporting of future research in organizations.

Communication Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, 529-552 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/009365087014005005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Turner and N. L. Reinsch Jr.
The Business Communicator as Presence Allocator: Multicommunicating, Equivocality, and Status at Work
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2007; 44(1): 36 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Turner, J. A. Grube, C. H. Tinsley, C. Lee, and C. O'Pell
Exploring the Dominant Media: How Does Media Use Reflect Organizational Norms and Affect Performance?
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2006; 43(3): 220 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
R. Barkhi
Information Exchange and Induced Cooperation in Group Decision Support Systems
Communication Research, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 646 - 678.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
B. van den Hooff, J. Groot, and S. de Jonge
Situational Influences on the Use of Communication Technologies: A Meta-Analysis and Exploratory Study
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2005; 42(1): 4 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
C. E. Timmerman
Media Selection During The Implementation Of Planned Organizational Change: A Predictive Framework Based on Implementation Approach and Phase
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2003; 16(3): 301 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
H. Topi, J. S. Valacich, and M. T. Rao
The Effects of Personality and Media Differences on the Performance of Dyads Addressing a Cognitive Conflict Task
Small Group Research, December 1, 2002; 33(6): 667 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. Lee and R. L. Heath
Managerial Media Selection and Information Evaluation from the Receiver's Perspective in Decision-Making Contexts
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1999; 13(1): 76 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
P. BOCZKOWSKI
Understanding the Development of Online Newspapers: Using Computer-Mediated Communication Theorizing to Study Internet Publishing
New Media Society, April 1, 1999; 1(1): 101 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
B. Donabedian, S. M. McKinnon, and W. J. Bruns Jr.
Task Characteristics, Managerial Socialization, and Media Selection
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1998; 11(3): 372 - 400.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
C.B. Crawford and C. S. Strohkirch
Influence Methods and Innovators: Technocrats and Champions
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, April 1, 1997; 4(2): 43 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
F. Eribo
International media use by Nigerian journalists: A survey
International Communication Gazette, January 1, 1997; 58(2): 131 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
L. Thomas, R. T. Clift, and T. Sugimoto
Telecommunication, Student Teaching, and Methods Instruction: An Exploratory Investigation
Journal of Teacher Education, May 1, 1996; 47(3): 165 - 174.



Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. Fulk, J. Schmitz, and D. Ryu
Cognitive Elements in the Social Construction of Communication Technology
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1995; 8(3): 259 - 288.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
C. B. Sullivan
Preferences for Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication Tasks
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 1995; 32(1): 49 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
A. R. Dennis and J. S. Valacich
Group, Sub-Group, and Nominal Group Idea Generation: New Rules for a New Media?
Journal of Management, August 1, 1994; 20(4): 723 - 736.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
R. E. Rice, S.-J. Chang, and J. Torobin
Communicator Style, Media Use, Organizational Level, and Use and Evaluation of Electronic Messaging
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1992; 6(1): 3 - 33.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. DOBOS
Gratification Models of Satisfaction and Choice of Communication Channels in Organizations
Communication Research, February 1, 1992; 19(1): 29 - 51.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. B. WALTHER
Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective
Communication Research, February 1, 1992; 19(1): 52 - 90.
[Abstract]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
E. R. Alexander III, L. E. Penley, and I. E. Jernigan
The Effect of Individual Differences on Managerial Media Choice
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1991; 5(2): 155 - 173.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. SCHMITZ and J. FULK
Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail: A Test of the Social Influence Model of Technology Use
Communication Research, August 1, 1991; 18(4): 487 - 523.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. Fulk and B. Boyd
Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations
Journal of Management, June 1, 1991; 17(2): 407 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
L. E. Penley, E. R. Alexander, I. E. Jernigan, and C. I. Henwood
Communication Abilities of Managers: The Relationship to Performance
Journal of Management, March 1, 1991; 17(1): 57 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. H. Komsky
A Profile of Users of Electronic Mail in a University: Frequent Versus Occasional Users
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1991; 4(3): 310 - 340.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. FULK, C. W. STEINFIELD, J. SCHMITZ, and J. G. POWER
A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations
Communication Research, October 1, 1987; 14(5): 529 - 552.
[Abstract]