Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PAPA, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by TRACY, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Communicative Indices of Employee Performance With New Technology

MICHAEL J. PAPA

KAREN TRACY

The relationship between employee performance and communicative abilities was investigated in a field study of 128 claims adjusters from two insurance company offices. The study examines the relationships between communicator competence, listening ability, and frequency of task-related talk and employee performance with new technology. Comparisons are also made with individual levels of past productivity. Multiple regression analysis reveals significant positive relationships between each of the communication variables and employee productivity with new technology. Post hoc analyses reveal that two of the communication factors (communicator competence and frequency of task-related talk), and general level of past task productivity are significant predictors of two additional performance measures: (a) the productivity decrease that occurred during the first week in which the new technology was used and (b) the speed with which the employees returned to their average previous productivity levels using the new technology.

Communication Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, 524-544 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/009365088015005002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
H. J. Payne
Reconceptualizing Social Skills in Organizations: Exploring the Relationship between Communication Competence, Job Performance, and Supervisory Roles
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2005; 11(2): 63 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
D. McGee Wanguri
A Review, an Integration, and a Critique of Cross-Disciplinary Research on Performance Appraisals, Evaluations, and Feedback: 1980-1990
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 1995; 32(3): 267 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Haas and C. L. Arnold
An Examination of the Role of Listening in Judgments of Communication Competence in Co-Workers
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 1995; 32(2): 123 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
W. H. Papa and M. J. Papa
Communication Network Patterns and the Re-invention of New Technology
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 1992; 29(1): 41 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. Fulk and B. Boyd
Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations
Journal of Management, June 1, 1991; 17(2): 407 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. J. PAPA
Communication Network Patterns and Employee Performance With New Technology
Communication Research, June 1, 1990; 17(3): 344 - 368.
[Abstract]