Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WATERMAN, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"Narrowcasting" and "Broadcasting" on Nonbroadcast Media

A Program Choice Model

DAVID WATERMAN

This article revises and extends economic models of program choice to explain why nonbroadcast video technologies such as cable and videocassettes not only segment audiences more finely with "narrow appeal" programs but also offer relatively expensive, apparently "broad appeal" programs that are typically repeated on different media over time. Specifically, it shows plausible conditions under which the availability of direct pricing mechanisms and expanded channel capacity (or the introduction of new video delivery systems) may induce a program producer or distributor with monopoly power to broaden rather than more narrowly focus program appeal, in conjunction with increasing production expenditures on those programs. Contrary to previous models, these programs may have increasingly "lowest common denominator" content. Evidence of successful intertemporal price discrimination by theatrical movie distributors and of production cost inflation are offered in empirical support. Nonbroadcast media appear to increase social welfare in economic terms, although these benefits are apparently mitigated by higher rents paid to factors of production.

Communication Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 3-28 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/009365092019001001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?