Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McANANY, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by WILKINSON, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

From Cultural Imperialists to Takeover Victims

Questions on Hollywood's Buyouts From the Critical Tradition

EMILE G. McANANY

KENTON T. WILKINSON

The question some ask about the Hollywood buyouts by major foreign interests is whether ownership changes alter the principal questions posed by the cultural imperialism tradition. From a critical perspective, the answer is no, because the set of underlying problems still remains. This article traces some of the history of the term from its Latin American origins in the 1970s to Europe in the 1980s. A look at more recent writings on the issues of cultural hegemony shows how, although the terms of the debate have changed some what, significant current issues, such as market dominance, cultural practice, and audience reception, remain to be fully explored. A review of the sale of Hollywood assets from the mid-1980s does not suggest fundamental changes in the process of cultural production or distribution. Many areas for critical research remain to be addressed.

Communication Research, Vol. 19, No. 6, 724-748 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/009365092019006004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GazetteHome page
S. Malhotra and E. M. Rogers
Satellite Television and the New Indian Woman
International Communication Gazette, October 1, 2000; 62(5): 407 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Communication InquiryHome page
F. Darling-Wolf
Texts in Context: Intertextuality, Hybridity, and the Negotiation of Cultural Identity in Japan
Journal of Communication Inquiry, April 1, 2000; 24(2): 134 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
C. A. I. Phekoo, P. D. Driscoll, and M. B. Salwen
U.S. television viewing in Trinidad: Cultural consequences on adolescents
International Communication Gazette, January 1, 1996; 57(2): 97 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]