Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LASHLEY, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Even in Public Television, Ownership Changes Matter

MARILYN E. LASHLEY

Although there have been no "purchases of controlling shares" in public broadcasting, executive and legislative turnover has generated a type of "ownership change" that has had greater impact on public television policy than more recent ownership changes may have had on commercial broadcasting. In the following study, archival records obtained from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, congressional hearings, and presidential documents for fiscal years 1967-1989 are used to demonstrate that executive and legislative turnover is a type of ownership change that has profound consequences for public broadcasting. To this end, the policy preferences imposed during the administrations of Presidents Johnson, Nixon, Carter, and Reagan are described; the attendant modifications in organizational structure are identified; and the effects of these ownership changes on public television programming content are delineated. Specifically, it is shown that executive turnover has kept public broadcasting mired in budgetary crises that have transformed the very goals (policy preferences), structure, and programming content of public television over time.

Communication Research, Vol. 19, No. 6, 770-786 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/009365092019006006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Communication InquiryHome page
G. Baym
The Promise and the Product: A Textual-Critical Analysis of Public Television's NewsHour
Journal of Communication Inquiry, July 1, 2000; 24(3): 312 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
M. I. Ayish
Arab Television Goes Commercial: A Case Study of the Middle East Broadcasting Centre
International Communication Gazette, December 1, 1997; 59(6): 473 - 494.
[Abstract]