This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GEIGER, S. Articles by REEVES, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Scene Changes and Semantic Relatedness on Attention to Television

BYRON REEVES

Two laboratory experiments tested the proposition that attention to television is the product of an interaction between message structure and content. Cuts (structure) were hypothesized to affect attention differently, depending on whether they linked related or unrelated content. Subjects viewed six semantically related and six semantically unrelated sequences of television. In Experiment 1, attention was measured using reaction times to a secondary task at one video frame, 1 second and 2 seconds following a cut. Unrelated sequences required more attention 1 second after the cut. Attention to related sequences decreased over the course of the entire sequence, whereas attention to unrelated sequences remained constant over time. Experiment 2 assessed attention during the first second after the cut. Related sequences produced longer reaction times immediately following the cut at 10 and 20 frames; unrelated sequences produced longer reaction times further from the cut, at 20 frames, and 1 second. This pattern of results is explained using a dual process model of attention to television.

Communication Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, 155-175 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/009365093020002001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D. BOLLS, A. LANG, and R. F. POTTER The Effects of Message Valence and Listener Arousal on Attention, Memory, and Facial Muscular Responses to Radio Advertisements Communication Research, October 1, 2001; 28(5): 627 - 651. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. POOL, T. H. A. VAN DER VOORT, J. W. J. BEENTJES, and C. M. KOOLSTRA Background Television as an Inhibitor of Performance on Easy and Difficult Homework Assignments Communication Research, June 1, 2000; 27(3): 293 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. P. HAWKINS, J. TAPPER, L. BRUCE, and S. PINGREE Strategic and Nonstrategic Explanations for Attentional Inertia Communication Research, April 1, 1995; 22(2): 188 - 206. [Abstract]

				M. D. BASIL Multiple Resource Theory I: Application to Television Viewing Communication Research, April 1, 1994; 21(2): 177 - 207. [Abstract]

				M. D. BASIL Multiple Resource Theory II: Empirical Examination of Modality-Specific Attention to Television Scenes Communication Research, April 1, 1994; 21(2): 208 - 231. [Abstract]

				J. J. BURNS and D. R. ANDERSON Attentional Inertia and Recognition Memory in Adult Television Viewing Communication Research, December 1, 1993; 20(6): 777 - 799. [Abstract]