| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/009365094021002001 Encouraging Charitable ContributionsAn Examination of Three Models of Door-in-the-Face Compliance
This study tested three models of the door-in-the-face (DITF) compliance strategyreciprocal concessions, perceptual contrast, and self-presentation. These accounts were tested in a fundraising context by manipulating the variables concession labeling, initial request size, and anticipated future interaction in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design with a stand-alone control group. The hypothesized mediating variable for each accountobligation, cost concerns, and image concernswas assessed. A DITF effect was obtained. With regard to the models, concession labeling led to stronger feelings of obligation to donate, but did not affect compliance. The manipulation of anticipated interaction elevated impression management concerns, but these concerns did not motivate donating. The failure of the concession and self-presentation accounts is explained by their interaction; concession labeling facilitated charity when interaction with the solicitor was anticipated, but backfired when interaction was not expected. No support was found for the perceptual contrast explanation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

