This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by CARPINI, M. X. D. Articles by WILLIAMS, B. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Methods, Metaphors, and Media Research

The Uses of Television in Political Conversation

BRUCE A. WILLIAMS

The purpose in this article is threefold: to make explicit the implicit metaphors underlying mainstream public-opinion research and their relationships to the methodologies employed, to offer an alternative "conversational" metaphor for the relationship between television and public opinion, and to present some findings form the authors' initial attempts to investigate empirically this relationship. First the authors argue that most public-opinion research results from, and reinforces, an implicit metaphor of citizens as "political consumers" and media messages as "hypodermic injections." The authors then present an alternative metaphor that emphasizes the role of discourse in the formation of public opinions and that conceptualizes television and viewers as participants in an ongoing "conversation." The third section discusses focus groups as a means of observing this conversation. The authors describe their own focus group project and present some initial findings that support the usefulness both of focus groups as a method of inquiry and of their conversational metaphor.

Communication Research, Vol. 21, No. 6, 782-812 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/009365094021006007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. L. LaMarre, K. D. Landreville, and M. A. Beam The Irony of Satire: Political Ideology and the Motivation to See What You Want to See in The Colbert Report International Journal of Press/Politics, April 1, 2009; 14(2): 212 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Parmelee, S. C. Perkins, and J. J. Sayre "What About People Our Age?" Applying Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Uncover How Political Ads Alienate College Students Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2007; 1(2): 183 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. Pan, L. Shen, H.-J. Paek, and Y. Sun Mobilizing Political Talk in a Presidential Campaign: An Examination of Campaign Effects in a Deliberative Framework Communication Research, October 1, 2006; 33(5): 315 - 345. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Holbert A Typology for the Study of Entertainment Television and Politics American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2005; 49(3): 436 - 453. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Kwak, A. E. Williams, X. Wang, and H. Lee Talking Politics and Engaging Politics:: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement Communication Research, February 1, 2005; 32(1): 87 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. N. Shelby and N. L. Reinsch Jr. Writing in Noninterpersonal Settings: Rhetorical Choices by Nonprofessional Writers in Letters to a Senator Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 50 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Ohr and P. R. Schrott Campaigns and Information Seeking: Evidence from a German State Election European Journal of Communication, December 1, 2001; 16(4): 419 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]