Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANG, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Defining Audio/Video Redundancy From a Limited- Capacity Information Processing Perspective

ANNIE LANG

This article applies a limited-capacity information processing approach to the question of whether audio / video redundancy improves memory for television messages. Audio / video redundancy is defined as a continuum. Four different types of stimuli frequently used to operationalize redundancy are considered in terms of: (a) how much capacity they require to be fully processed; (b) how complex they are; and, (c) how much audio and video information they contain. Predictions based on these considerations are made about relative memory for each type of stimulus at three levels of processing (encoding, storage, and retrieval). The three major memory measures are conceptualized as providing information about different aspects of the information processing of a message. Specifically, recognition measures index how much information was encoded, cued recall indexes how much information has been stored, and free recall indexes the information available for retrieval. The predictions made using this theoretical approach are initially tested using the results previously reported in the literature. Over 75% of the reported results are in the direction predicted. It is suggested that talking head messages are different from other forms of audio / video redundancy, that audio memory is affected more by audio / video redundancy than video memory, and that video memory is affected more by complexity and amount of information—both of which are frequently confounded with redundancy.

Communication Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 86-115 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/009365095022001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
M. Tremayne
Manipulating interactivity with thematically hyperlinked news texts: a media learning experiment
New Media Society, October 1, 2008; 10(5): 703 - 727.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
G. Cassidy and R. A.R. MacDonald
The effect of background music and background noise on the task performance of introverts and extraverts
Psychology of Music, July 1, 2007; 35(3): 517 - 537.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Y. Fujioka
Emotional TV Viewing and Minority Audience: How Mexican Americans Process and Evaluate TV News About In-Group Members
Communication Research, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 566 - 593.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
B. G. Southwell
Between Messages and People: A Multilevel Model of Memory for Television Content
Communication Research, February 1, 2005; 32(1): 112 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. R. Fox
A Signal Detection Analysis of Audio/Video Redundancy Effects in Television News Video
Communication Research, October 1, 2004; 31(5): 524 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
F. Diao and S. S. Sundar
Orienting Response and Memory for Web Advertisements:: Exploring Effects of Pop-Up Window and Animation
Communication Research, October 1, 2004; 31(5): 537 - 567.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
E. P. Bucy and S. D. Bradley
Presidential Expressions and Viewer Emotion: Counterempathic Responses to Televised Leader Displays
Social Science Information, March 1, 2004; 43(1): 59 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. M. POOL, T. H. A. VAN DER VOORT, J. W. J. BEENTJES, and C. M. KOOLSTRA
Background Television as an Inhibitor of Performance on Easy and Difficult Homework Assignments
Communication Research, June 1, 2000; 27(3): 293 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. H. WALMA VAN DER MOLEN and T. H. A. VAN DER VOORT
Children's and Adults' Recall of Television and Print News in Children's and Adult News Formats
Communication Research, April 1, 2000; 27(2): 132 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]