Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HERTOG, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by FAN, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Press Coverage on Social Beliefs

The Case of HIV Transmission

JAMES K. HERTOG

DAVID P. FAN

This study reviewed the impact of newspaper and newsmagazine coverage of AIDS from 1987 through 1991 on public beliefs concerning the likelihood of HIV transmission via toilets, sneezing, and insects. Fan's ideodynamic model was applied to an analysis of coverage in The New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Time magazine, Newsweek, US News and World Report, and the United Press International newswire. The trend line formed was then compared to public opinion polls concerning each of the HIV transmission routes. A significant relationship was found, and when Granger causality tests were applied, prediction was unidirectional—from news content to public opinion and not from opinion to content. Implications for theories of media effect were noted.

Communication Research, Vol. 22, No. 5, 545-574 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/009365095022005002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
Y. Hwang and B. G. Southwell
Science TV News Exposure Predicts Science Beliefs: Real World Effects Among a National Sample
Communication Research, October 1, 2009; 36(5): 724 - 742.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
C. Connolly-Ahern and S. C. Broadway
"To Booze or Not to Booze?" Newspaper Coverage of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Science Communication, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 362 - 385.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
P. A. Anastasio, K. C. Rose, and J. G. Chapman
The Divisive Coverage Effect: How Media May Cleave Differences of Opinion Between Social Groups
Communication Research, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 171 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
I. Yanovitzky
Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection
Communication Research, August 1, 2002; 29(4): 422 - 451.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
I. YANOVITZKY and C. BENNETT
Media Attention, Institutional Response, and Health Behavior Change: The Case of Drunk Driving, 1978-1996
Communication Research, August 1, 1999; 26(4): 429 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
D. P. Fan
Computer Content Analysis of Press Coverage and Prediction of Public Opinion for the 1995 Sovereignty Referendum in Quebec
Social Science Computer Review, December 1, 1997; 15(4): 351 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]