Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FITZPATRICK, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by KRCMAR, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effect of Family Communication Environments on Children's Social Behavior During Middle Childhood

MARY ANNE FITZPATRICK

LINDA J. MARSHALL

TIMOTHY J. LEUTWILER

MARINA KRCMAR

The family communication environments of school-age children in Grades 1, 4, 6, and 7 were measured using "talking picture books" containing dialogues representing various types of family communication. Children listened to the dialogues and examined cartoon pictures depicting different families. Using this information, children identified their families as either (a) pluralistic (high conversation and low conformity), (b) consensual (high conversation and high conformity), (c) protective (low conversation and high conformity), or (d) laissez-faire (low conversation and low conformity). Children completed the revised Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and teachers rated each child's social self-restraint and social withdrawal. Results revealed an interaction among family type, sex, and grade level for both social withdrawal and social self-restraint, suggesting that family communication environments may be differentially beneficial for boys and girls at particular points of development.

Communication Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 379-406 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/009365096023004003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
M. Matsunaga and T. T. Imahori
Profiling Family Communication Standards: A U.S.-Japan Comparison
Communication Research, February 1, 2009; 36(1): 3 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Small Group ResearchHome page
V. E. Barker, J. R. Abrams, V. Tiyaamornwong, D. R. Seibold, A. Duggan, H. S. Park, and M. Sebastian
New Contexts for Relational Communication in Groups
Small Group Research, August 1, 2000; 31(4): 470 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]