Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BROSIUS, H.-B.
Right arrow Articles by WEIMANN, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Who Sets the Agenda

Agenda-Setting as a Two-Step Flow

HANS-BERND BROSIUS

GABRIEL WEIMANN

This study examines four models of a two-step flow of the agenda-setting process, highlighting the role played by certain individuals (early recognizers) in mediating between the public and the media. The data sets contained coding of news items on the major German television networks from 1990 to 1993 and 28 surveys conducted in West and East Germany between September 1990 and December 1992, sampling over 1,000 individuals in each survey to study the public agenda. The findings highlight the role of early recognizers, not only in identifying emerging issues in the media and diffusing them among the public but also in affecting the media agenda. The study's important contribution lies in identifying the flow of issues from the public to the media and within the public, thus reviving, to some extent, the notion of the two-step flow of communication.

Communication Research, Vol. 23, No. 5, 561-580 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/009365096023005002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
I. Huck, O. Quiring, and H.-B. Brosius
Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 139 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
M. C. Nisbet and J. E. Kotcher
A Two-Step Flow of Influence?: Opinion-Leader Campaigns on Climate Change
Science Communication, March 1, 2009; 30(3): 328 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
G. Weimann, D. H. Tustin, D. van Vuuren, and J. P. R. Joubert
Looking for Opinion Leaders: Traditional vs. Modern Measures in Traditional Societies
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2007; 19(2): 173 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
H. D. Wu, M. W. McCracken, and S. Saito
Economic Communication in the 'Lost Decade': News Coverage and the Japanese Recession
International Communication Gazette, April 1, 2004; 66(2): 133 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]