This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by PAULSON, G. D. Articles by ROLOFF, M. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effect of Request Form and Content on Constructing Obstacles to Compliance

MICHAEL E. ROLOFF

In this article, we explore the degree to which the language used in a request affects both the way it is perceived and the refusals that it prompts. Accordingly, we conducted an experiment in which we manipulated the form and the content of date requests. Request forms that addressed an obstacle were perceived to be more conventional and more polite, and were met with more polite refusals than were request forms that did not specify an obstacle. Furthermore, when the request content included a specific time for the date, refusers generated more unstable obstacles than when no time was proposed. Conversely, time-ambiguous requests were met with more stable obstacles than were time-specific requests. Contrary to our expectations, the amount of face work in the discourse of a refusal was unaffected by request form and was marginally related to request content. Implications for requesters and refusers are discussed.

Communication Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 261-290 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/009365097024003003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. L. BESSON, M. E. ROLOFF, and G. D. PAULSON Preserving Face in Refusal Situations Communication Research, April 1, 1998; 25(2): 183 - 199. [Abstract]