This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by CRUZ, M. G. Articles by RODRÍGUEZ, J. I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Impact of Group Size and Proportion of Shared Information on the Exchange and Integration of Information in Groups

FRANKLIN J. BOSTER

JÓSE I. RODRÍGUEZ

Hidden profiles exist when individual group members hold all the information favoring one decision alternative but only a subset of the information favoring another alternative. Given a hidden profile, group members often fail to exchange information completely and consequently make poor decisions. Circumstances in which groups perform poorly are worrisome because groups frequently are asked to make decisions. Conditions that improve group performance on hidden profiles were sought. Group information sharing and decision-making effectiveness were found to be higher in small groups with a low percentage of shared information, and lower when groups either were large or shared a high percentage of information (N = 80 groups). Greater information sharing, however, did not correlate with longer discussions. The proportion of shared information affected bolstering and discounting of information. Qualitative observations of group behavior are presented, and the implications of the results for information sharing and decision making are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. D. Henningsen and M. L. M. Henningsen Do Groups Know What They Don't Know? Dealing With Missing Information in Decision-Making Groups Communication Research, October 1, 2007; 34(5): 507 - 525. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Van Swol Perceived Importance of Information: The Effects of Mentioning Information, Shared Information Bias, Ownership Bias, Reiteration, and Confirmation Bias Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 239 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. D. Henningsen, M. L. M. Henningsen, J. Eden, and M. G. Cruz Examining the Symptoms of Groupthink and Retrospective Sensemaking Small Group Research, February 1, 2006; 37(1): 36 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Kwak, A. E. Williams, X. Wang, and H. Lee Talking Politics and Engaging Politics:: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement Communication Research, February 1, 2005; 32(1): 87 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. D. Henningsen and M. L. M. Henningsen Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts Small Group Research, August 1, 2003; 34(4): 391 - 412. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. SAVADORI, L. M. VAN SWOL, and J. A. SNIEZEK Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems Communication Research, December 1, 2001; 28(6): 737 - 771. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M. WITTENBAUM The Bias Toward Discussing Shared Information: Why Are High-Status Group Members Immune Communication Research, June 1, 2000; 27(3): 379 - 401. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. G. CRUZ, D. D. HENNINGSEN, and B. A. SMITH The Impact of Directive Leadership on Group Information Sampling, Decisions, and Perceptions of the Leader Communication Research, June 1, 1999; 26(3): 349 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]