|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Cultural Variability in Communication
An Introduction
WILLIAM B. GUDYKUNST
My purpose in this article is to introduce studying cultural variability in communication in general and this special issue in particular. I begin by examining the nature of culture. Next, I review the emic and etic approaches to studying communication and culture with a focus on the major dimensions of cultural variability used to explain communication across cultures. Following this, I examine individual-level processes that mediate the influence of culture on communication. I conclude by overviewing the articles included in this issue and discussing how they are consistent with current trends in the study of cultural variability in communication.
Communication Research, Vol. 24, No. 4,
327-348 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/009365097024004001

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Leonard, J. R. Van Scotter, and F. Pakdil
Culture and Communication: Cultural Variations and Media Effectiveness
Administration Society,
November 1, 2009;
41(7):
850 - 877.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Shulruf, J. Hattie, and R. Dixon
Development of a New Measurement Tool for Individualism and Collectivism
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
December 1, 2007;
25(4):
385 - 401.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Shin
A Person-Environment Fit Model for Virtual Organizations
Journal of Management,
October 1, 2004;
30(5):
725 - 743.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Matveev and P. E. Nelson
Cross Cultural Communication Competence and Multicultural Team Performance: Perceptions of American and Russian Managers
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,
August 1, 2004;
4(2):
253 - 270.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Schaffer and C. M. Riordan
A Review of Cross-Cultural Methodologies for Organizational Research: A Best- Practices Approach
Organizational Research Methods,
April 1, 2003;
6(2):
169 - 215.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|