This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by IFERT, D. E. Articles by ROLOFF, M. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Understanding Obstacles Preventing Compliance

Conceptualization and Classification

MICHAEL E. ROLOFF

Although the obstacle hypothesis has proven useful in understanding communication choices during request sequences, its utility is limited by the lack of explication of the obstacle construct. This article examines the types of obstacles that may be perceived and dimensions that differentiate them. Results suggest that six types of obstacles—possession, imposition, inappropriateness, postpone, no incentive, and recalcitrance—are perceived by individuals in request interactions. These obstacles appear to be distinguishable in the degree to which they reflect unwillingness to comply, inability to comply, and personal characteristics of the requester. The discussion section explores the implications of this conceptualization on understanding request interactions.

Communication Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 131-153 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/009365098025002001


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M. Fennis, E. Das, and A. Th.H. Pruyn Interpersonal Communication and Compliance: The Disrupt-Then-Reframe Technique in Dyadic Influence Settings Communication Research, April 1, 2006; 33(2): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]