Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLEOD, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by HOLBERT, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Values as Sociotropic Judgments Influencing Communication Patterns

JACK M. McLEOD

MIRA SOTIROVIC

R. LANCE HOLBERT

Explanations of why people use various types of media content have been limited mainly to demographic location and self-interested motivational variables. The authors present an alternative, sociotropic source of influence on communication patterns: judgments of how the world works (worldviews), what societal values ought to be pursued (materialism vs. postmaterialism), and what normative roles the news media should play. A well-fitting structural equation model is used to account for substantial amounts of variance in entertainment television viewing, newspaper public affairs reading, and discussion of controversial issues. Sociotropic judgments mediate much of the influence of demographics and ideology on patterns of communication. Diversity in the composition of personal discussion networks has a strong and direct influence on communication patterns.

Communication Research, Vol. 25, No. 5, 453-485 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/009365098025005001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
H. Rojas
Strategy Versus Understanding: How Orientations Toward Political Conversation Influence Political Engagement
Communication Research, August 1, 2008; 35(4): 452 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
M. T. Stephenson and R. L. Holbert
A Monte Carlo Simulation of Observable Versus Latent Variable Structural Equation Modeling Techniques
Communication Research, June 1, 2003; 30(3): 332 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 GazetteHome page
C. E. Beaudoin and E. Thorson
Value Representations in Foreign News
International Communication Gazette, December 1, 2001; 63(6): 481 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
J. M. McLEOD, D. A. SCHEUFELE, P. MOY, E. M. HOROWITZ, R. L. HOLBERT, W. ZHANG, S. ZUBRIC, and J. ZUBRIC
Understanding Deliberation: The Effects of Discussion Networks on Participation in a Public Forum
Communication Research, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 743 - 774.
[Abstract] [PDF]