Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Learn about Basics of Communication

Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCOMAS, K.
Right arrow Articles by SHANAHAN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Telling Stories About Global Climate Change

Measuring the Impact of Narratives on Issue Cycles

KATHERINE McCOMAS

JAMES SHANAHAN

A theory of cyclical patterns in media coverage of environmental issues must account for more than intrinsic qualities of the issues themselves: Narrative factors must be considered. A content analysis of The New York Times and The Washington Post stories from 1980 to 1995 shows how media construct narratives about global warming and how these narratives may influence attention cycles. Empirically, the frequency of newspaper coverage shows cyclical attention to global warming. The content analysis further reveals that implied danger and consequences of global warming gain more prominence on the upswing of newspaper attention, whereas controversy among scientists receives greater attention in the maintenance phase. The economics of dealing with global warming also receive greater attention during the maintenance and downside of the attention cycle. The discussion offers a narrative explanation and suggests the outcome of the "master story" of global climate change may discourage future attention to global warming.

Communication Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, 30-57 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/009365099026001003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
A. Carvalho
Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change
Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 223 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
M. C. Nisbet and M. Huge
Attention Cycles and Frames in the Plant Biotechnology Debate: Managing Power and Participation through the Press/Policy Connection
International Journal of Press/Politics, April 1, 2006; 11(2): 3 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
A. Ruth, L. Lundy, R. Telg, and T. Irani
Trying to Relate: Media Relations Training Needs of Agricultural Scientists
Science Communication, September 1, 2005; 27(1): 127 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
J. B. Corbett and J. L. Durfee
Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming
Science Communication, December 1, 2004; 26(2): 129 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
K. M. Wilson
Forecasting the Future: How Television Weathercasters--Attitudes and Beliefs about Climate Change Affect Their Cognitive Knowledge on the Science
Science Communication, December 1, 2002; 24(2): 246 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
J. Shanahan and J. Good
Heat and hot air: influence of local temperature on journalists' coverage of global warming
Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 2000; 9(3): 285 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
K. M. Wilson
Drought, debate, and uncertainty: measuring reporters' knowledge and ignorance about climate change
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2000; 9(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]