Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Learn about Basics of Communication
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EVELAND, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by McLEOD, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary

Perceived Likelihood of Expsoure and the Third-Person Perception

WILLIAM P. EVELAND, JR.

AMY I. NATHANSON

BENJAMIN H. DETENBER

DOUGLAS M. McLEOD

Researchers have proposed a social distance corollary to the third-person perception to explain the common finding that as comparison groups become more different from the self or more generally described, the size of the third-person perception increases (i.e., media messages are perceived to have greater negative impact on others than self). The two studies presented here investigate whether third-person perceptions are influenced by social distance or perceived likelihood of exposure. We differentiate three ways of operationalizing social distance and examine whether perceived impact increases along each dimension of social distance. The results of our studies demonstrated that perceived likelihood of exposure was a strong predictor of perceived impact, whereas the perceived social distance of the comparison group was not. These findings indicate that previous social distance findings may actually be an artifact of inferences about how likely comparison groups are to be exposed to the media content in question.

Communication Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 275-302 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/009365099026003001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
M. B. Oliver, H. Yang, S. Ramasubramanian, J. Kim, and S. Lee
Exploring Implications of Perceived Media Reinforcement on Third-Person Perceptions
Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 745 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
M. P. Boyle, D. M. McLeod, and H. Rojas
The Role of Ego Enhancement and Perceived Message Exposure in Third-Person Judgments Concerning Violent Video Games
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 165 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
G. J. Golan and S. A. Banning
Exploring a Link Between the Third-Person Effect and the Theory of Reasoned Action: Beneficial Ads and Social Expectations
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 208 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
Y. Y. Choi, G. Leshner, and J. Choi
Third-Person Effects of Idealized Body Image in Magazine Advertisements
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 147 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
Ran Wei, V.-H. Lo, and H.-Y. Lu
Third-Person Effects of Health News: Exploring the Relationships Among Media Exposure, Presumed Media Influence, and Behavioral Intentions
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 261 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
J. Xu and W. J. Gonzenbach
Does a Perceptual Discrepancy Lead to Action? A Meta-analysis of the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 375 - 385.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
H. Cho and F. J. Boster
First and Third Person Perceptions on Anti-Drug Ads Among Adolescents
Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 169 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
Ye Sun, Lijiang Shen, and Zhongdang Pan
On the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect
Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 257 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
S. C. Chia and W. Lee
Pluralistic Ignorance About Sex: The Direct and the Indirect Effects of Media Consumption on College Students' Misperception of Sex-Related Peer Norms
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2008; 20(1): 52 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
T. M. Chock, J. R. Fox, J. R. Angelini, S. Lee, and A. Lang
Telling Me Quickly: How Arousing Fast-Paced PSAs Decrease Self-Other Differences
Communication Research, December 1, 2007; 34(6): 618 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
Z. Pan, J. L. Abisaid, H.-J. Paek, Y. Sun, and D. Houden
Exploring the Perceptual Gap in Perceived Effects of Media Reports of Opinion Polls
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2006; 18(3): 340 - 350.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
P. C. Meirick
Rethinking the Target Corollary: The Effects of Social Distance, Perceived Exposure, and Perceived Predispositions on First-Person and Third-Person Perceptions
Communication Research, December 1, 2005; 32(6): 822 - 843.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
P. C. Meirick
Self-Enhancement Motivation as a Third Variable in the Relationship Between First- and Third-Person Effects
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2005; 17(4): 473 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
H.-J. Paek, Z. Pan, Y. Sun, J. Abisaid, and D. Houden
The Third-Person Perception as Social Judgment: An Exploration of Social Distance and Uncertainty in Perceived Effects of Political Attack Ads
Communication Research, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 143 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
P. C. Meirick
Topic-Relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance: Political Advertising and First- and Third-Person Effects
Communication Research, April 1, 2004; 31(2): 234 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
E. Scharrer
Third-Person Perception and Television Violence: The Role of Out-Group Stereotyping in Perceptions of Susceptibility to Effects
Communication Research, December 1, 2002; 29(6): 681 - 704.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
P. David, G. Morrison, M. A. Johnson, and F. Ross
Body Image, Race, and Fashion Models: Social Distance and Social Identification in Third-Person Effects
Communication Research, June 1, 2002; 29(3): 270 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
K. Neuwirth, E. Frederick, and C. Mayo
Person-Effects and Heuristic-Systematic Processing
Communication Research, June 1, 2002; 29(3): 320 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
W. PEISER and J. PETER
Explaining Individual Differences in Third-Person Perception: A Limits / Possibilities Perspective
Communication Research, April 1, 2001; 28(2): 156 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
L. HENRIKSEN and J. A. FLORA
Third-Person Perception and Children: Perceived Impact of Pro- and Anti-Smoking Ads
Communication Research, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 643 - 665.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
M. B. SALWEN and M. DUPAGNE
The Third-Person Effect: Perceptions of the Media's Influence and Immoral Consequences
Communication Research, October 1, 1999; 26(5): 523 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]