Communication Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Communication Research, Vol. 26, No. 4, 482-507 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/009365099026004006
© 1999 SAGE Publications

Critical Systems Theory

A Political Economy of Language, Thought, and Technology

PHILIP GRAHAM

An emergent form of political economy, facilitated by information and communication technologies (ICTs), is widely propagated as the apotheosis of unmitigated social, economic, and technological progress. Meanwhile, throughout the world, social degradation and economic inequality are increasing logarithmically. Valued categories of thought are, axiomatically, the basic commodities of the knowledge economy. Language is its means of exchange. This article proposes a sociolinguistic method with which to critically engage the hyperbole of the Information Age. The method is grounded in a systemic social theory that synthesizes aspects of autopoiesis and Marxist political economy. A trade policy statement is analyzed to exemplify the sociolinguistically created aberrations that are today most often construed as social and political determinants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
I. Weber and L. Jia
Internet and self-regulation in China: the cultural logic of controlled commodification
Media Culture Society, September 1, 2007; 29(5): 772 - 789.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
I. Weber
Digitizing the dragon: challenges facing China's broadcasting industry
New Media Society, December 1, 2005; 7(6): 791 - 809.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
I. Weber
Localizing the Global: Successful Strategies for Selling Television Programmes to China
International Communication Gazette, June 1, 2003; 65(3): 273 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
I. WEBER and V. EVANS
Constructing the Meaning of Digital Television in Britain, the United States and Australia
New Media Society, December 1, 2002; 4(4): 435 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
P. GRAHAM
Hypercapitalism: A Political Economy of Informational Idealism
New Media Society, June 1, 2000; 2(2): 131 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]