This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by SALWEN, M. B. Articles by DUPAGNE, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Third-Person Effect

Perceptions of the Media's Influence and Immoral Consequences

MICHEL DUPAGNE

A nationwide telephone survey of 721 adults examined the impact of the third-person effect on individuals' perceptions of the media's general influence and immorality effects with three issues. The third-person effect perceptual hypothesis predicts that individuals will perceive media messages to have greater effects on other people than on themselves. A behavioral hypothesis predicts that third-person perception (i.e., seeing others as more influenced) will lead to support for restrictions on media messages. The findings reaffirmed robust support for the perceptual hypothesis. Regarding the behavioral hypothesis, effect perceptions were found to be issue dependent. For television violence, the issue with the clearest moral dimension, perceived immorality effects predicted support for restrictions. In contrast, perception of the media's general influence was a key predictor of support for restrictions on televised trials and negative political advertising. The failure of past research to distinguish dimensions of perceived effects may account for the less than robust findings regarding the behavioral hypothesis.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Jensen and S. Collins The Third-Person Effect in Controversial Product Advertising American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 225 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. J. Golan, S. A. Banning, and L. Lundy Likelihood to Vote, Candidate Choice, and the Third-Person Effect: Behavioral Implications of Political Advertising in the 2004 Presidential Election American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 278 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. J. Golan and S. A. Banning Exploring a Link Between the Third-Person Effect and the Theory of Reasoned Action: Beneficial Ads and Social Expectations American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 208 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Huh, D. E. DeLorme, and L. N. Reid Operationalizing the Second-Person Effect and Its Relationship to Behavioral Outcomes of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 186 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Y. Choi, G. Leshner, and J. Choi Third-Person Effects of Idealized Body Image in Magazine Advertisements American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 147 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. Day Out of the Living Room and Into the Voting Booth: An Analysis of Corporate Public Affairs Advertising Under the Third-Person Effect American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 243 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Xu and W. J. Gonzenbach Does a Perceptual Discrepancy Lead to Action? A Meta-analysis of the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 375 - 385. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mathias Kepplinger Reciprocal Effects: Toward a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers International Journal of Press/Politics, April 1, 2007; 12(2): 3 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Huh, D. E. Delorme, and L. N. Reid The Third-Person Effect and its Influence on Behavioral Outcomes in a Product Advertising Context:: The Case of Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising Communication Research, October 1, 2004; 31(5): 568 - 599. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. David, K. Liu, and M. Myser Methodological Artifact or Persistent Bias?: Testing the Robustness of the Third-Person and Reverse Third-Person Effects for Alcohol Messages Communication Research, April 1, 2004; 31(2): 206 - 233. [Abstract] [PDF]