This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by HENRIKSEN, L. Articles by FLORA, J. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Third-Person Perception and Children

Perceived Impact of Pro- and Anti-Smoking Ads

JUNE A. FLORA

Results of two studies provide the first evidence of third-person effect among children. In Study 1 (a survey of 571 seventh-grade students), children believed that cigarette advertisements influenced others more than themselves (third-person perception). Moreover, when children compared themselves with peers, the discrepancy between self and others was larger than when children compared themselves with their best friends (social distance corollary). In Study 2, children from Grades 4, 6, and 8 (n = 666) watched a 10-minute video portraying either cigarette or anti-smoking advertisements. Regardless of which video they watched, children believed that cigarette ads have greater influence on others than on themselves. The opposite was true for anti-smoking advertisements, however. Children believed that anti-smoking ads have greater influence on themselves than others (a reverse third-person perception). Children did not perceive uniformly greater impact of persuasive messages on people other than themselves. Instead, children's judgments of media influence were consistently self-serving. These findings corroborate a theory that third-person perception is the product of a superiority bias—the tendency to see ourselves as better, or better off, than others.

Communication Research, Vol. 26, No. 6, 643-665 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/009365099026006001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. B. Scales, J. L. Monahan, N. Rhodes, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen, and A. Johnson-Turbes Adolescents' Perceptions of Smoking and Stress Reduction Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2009; 36(4): 746 - 758. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Huck, O. Quiring, and H.-B. Brosius Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 139 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Boyle, D. M. McLeod, and H. Rojas The Role of Ego Enhancement and Perceived Message Exposure in Third-Person Judgments Concerning Violent Video Games American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 165 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. Day Out of the Living Room and Into the Voting Booth: An Analysis of Corporate Public Affairs Advertising Under the Third-Person Effect American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 243 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Ran Wei, V.-H. Lo, and H.-Y. Lu Third-Person Effects of Health News: Exploring the Relationships Among Media Exposure, Presumed Media Influence, and Behavioral Intentions American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 261 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Xu and W. J. Gonzenbach Does a Perceptual Discrepancy Lead to Action? A Meta-analysis of the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 375 - 385. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Cho and F. J. Boster First and Third Person Perceptions on Anti-Drug Ads Among Adolescents Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 169 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. M. Chock, J. R. Fox, J. R. Angelini, S. Lee, and A. Lang Telling Me Quickly: How Arousing Fast-Paced PSAs Decrease Self-Other Differences Communication Research, December 1, 2007; 34(6): 618 - 636. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Ran Wei, V.-H. Lo, and H.-Y. Lu Reconsidering the Relationship Between the Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias Communication Research, December 1, 2007; 34(6): 665 - 684. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-J. Paek and A. C. Gunther How Peer Proximity Moderates Indirect Media Influence on Adolescent Smoking Communication Research, August 1, 2007; 34(4): 407 - 432. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. J. Roese and J. M. Olson Better, Stronger, Faster: Self-Serving Judgment, Affect Regulation, and the Optimal Vigilance Hypothesis Perspectives on Psychological Science, June 1, 2007; 2(2): 124 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Huh and R. Langteau Presumed Influence of DTC Prescription Drug Advertising: Do Experts and Novices Think Differently? Communication Research, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 25 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V.-h. Lo and R. Wei Perceptual Differences in Assessing the Harm of Patronizing Adult Entertainment Clubs Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2006; 18(4): 475 - 487. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Meirick Self-Enhancement Motivation as a Third Variable in the Relationship Between First- and Third-Person Effects Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2005; 17(4): 473 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Paek, Z. Pan, Y. Sun, J. Abisaid, and D. Houden The Third-Person Perception as Social Judgment: An Exploration of Social Distance and Uncertainty in Perceived Effects of Political Attack Ads Communication Research, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 143 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Huh, D. E. Delorme, and L. N. Reid The Third-Person Effect and its Influence on Behavioral Outcomes in a Product Advertising Context:: The Case of Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising Communication Research, October 1, 2004; 31(5): 568 - 599. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. DILLARD and E. PECK Affect and Persuasion: Emotional Responses to Public Service Announcements Communication Research, August 1, 2000; 27(4): 461 - 495. [Abstract] [PDF]