This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by HOFFNER, C. Articles by SILBERG, K. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Support for Censorship of Television Violence

The Role of the Third-Person Effect and News Exposure

MARTHA BUCHANAN

JOEL DAVID ANDERSON

LISA A. HUBBS

STACY K. KAMIGAKI

LAURA KOWALCZYK

ANGELA PASTOREK

RICHARD S. PLOTKIN

KELSEY J. SILBERG

This study examined predictors of support for censorship of television violence, including third-person effects (the belief that others are more affected by televised violence than oneself) and exposure to specific news stories about the issue. A random sample of 253 residents in a small, Midwestern metropolitan area participated via telephone interviews. The third-person effect for aggression predicted greater support for censorship, but the third-person effect for mean-world perceptions did not. However, when perceived effects on self and others were examined separately, greater support for censorship was associated with respondents' beliefs that violent content increased others' aggressive tendencies but their own mean-world perceptions. More frequent exposure to news stories about imitation was associated with more willingness to censor violent content, but four other types of news stories were unrelated to censorship support. Interpretations and implications of these and other findings are discussed.

Communication Research, Vol. 26, No. 6, 726-742 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/009365099026006004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. J. Golan and S. A. Banning Exploring a Link Between the Third-Person Effect and the Theory of Reasoned Action: Beneficial Ads and Social Expectations American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 208 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Huh, D. E. DeLorme, and L. N. Reid Operationalizing the Second-Person Effect and Its Relationship to Behavioral Outcomes of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 186 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Ran Wei, V.-H. Lo, and H.-Y. Lu Third-Person Effects of Health News: Exploring the Relationships Among Media Exposure, Presumed Media Influence, and Behavioral Intentions American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 261 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Cohen and G. Weimann Who's Afraid of Reality Shows?: Exploring the Effects of Perceived Influence of Reality Shows and the Concern Over Their Social Effects on Willingness to Censor Communication Research, June 1, 2008; 35(3): 382 - 397. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Huh, D. E. Delorme, and L. N. Reid The Third-Person Effect and its Influence on Behavioral Outcomes in a Product Advertising Context:: The Case of Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising Communication Research, October 1, 2004; 31(5): 568 - 599. [Abstract] [PDF]