Communication Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRABE, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by BOLLS, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Communication Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 3-26 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/009365000027001001

Cognitive Access to Negatively Arousing News

An Experimental Investigation of the Knowledge Gap

MARIA ELIZABETH GRABE

ANNIE LANG

SHUHUA ZHOU

PAUL DAVID BOLLS

Over the past 30 years, survey researchers have documented the existence of a knowledge gap and expressed concern that people with little education are falling behind because they do not acquire the information necessary to participate in socioeconomic spheres. This study is the first to offer (a) experimental evidence for the existence of the knowledge gap and (b) explanations for it in terms of varying levels of information processing capacities, or cognitive access. Participants from higher and lower educational backgrounds paid equal levels of attention to television news stories, but they did not display the same recognition memory for facts. Moreover, participants in the higher education group were physiologically more aroused by news than those in the lower education group. These findings do not pinpoint whether cognitive access is learned or innate, but they do suggest that the biological systems of people from higher educational backgrounds are particularly alert in preparing for information processing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceHome page
L. Yu
Understanding information inequality: Making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, December 1, 2006; 38(4): 229 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. E. Grabe and R. Kamhawi
Hard Wired for Negative News? Gender Differences in Processing Broadcast News
Communication Research, October 1, 2006; 33(5): 346 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
B. B. Johnson and C. Chess
Evaluating Public Responses to Environmental Trend Indicators
Science Communication, September 1, 2006; 28(1): 64 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
J. L. Durfee
"Social Change" and "Status Quo" Framing Effects on Risk Perception: An Exploratory Experiment
Science Communication, June 1, 2006; 27(4): 459 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Y. Fujioka
Emotional TV Viewing and Minority Audience: How Mexican Americans Process and Evaluate TV News About In-Group Members
Communication Research, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 566 - 593.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
D. Rucinski
Community Boundedness, Personal Relevance, and the Knowledge Gap
Communication Research, August 1, 2004; 31(4): 472 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
W. P. EVELAND JR. and S. DUNWOODY
User Control and Structural Isomorphism or Disorientation and Cognitive Load?: Learning From the Web Versus Print
Communication Research, February 1, 2001; 28(1): 48 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]