Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WALTHER, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by TIDWELL, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?

Photographic Images in Long-Term and Short-Term Computer-Mediated Communication

JOSEPH B. WALTHER

CELESTE L. SLOVACEK

LISA C. TIDWELL

This article asks whether, and when, participants benefit from seeing each other's faces in computer-mediated communication. Although new technologies make it relatively easy to exchange images over the Internet, our formal understanding of their impacts is not clear. Some theories suggest that the more one can see of one's partners, the better one will like them. Others suggest that long-term virtual team members may like each other better than would those who use face-to-face interaction. The dynamic underlying this latter effect may also pertain to the presentation of realistic images compared with idealized virtual perceptions. A field experiment evaluated the timing of physical image presentations for members of short-term and long-term virtual, international groups. Results indicate that in new, unacquainted teams, seeing one's partner promotes affection and social attraction, but in long-term online groups, the same type of photograph dampens affinity.

Communication Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, 105-134 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/009365001028001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
H. Cho and J.-S. Lee
Collaborative Information Seeking in Intercultural Computer-Mediated Communication Groups: Testing the Influence of Social Context Using Social Network Analysis
Communication Research, August 1, 2008; 35(4): 548 - 573.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
S. C. D'Urso and S. A. Rains
Examining the Scope of Channel Expansion: A Test of Channel Expansion Theory With New and Traditional Communication Media
Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 21(4): 486 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. Pena, J. B. Walther, and J. T. Hancock
Effects of Geographic Distribution on Dominance Perceptions in Computer-Mediated Groups
Communication Research, June 1, 2007; 34(3): 313 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. L. Gibbs, N. B. Ellison, and R. D. Heino
Self-Presentation in Online Personals: The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating
Communication Research, April 1, 2006; 33(2): 152 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
U. Becker-Beck, M. Wintermantel, and A. Borg
Principles of Regulating Interaction in Teams Practicing Face-To-Face Communication Versus Teams Practicing Computer-Mediated Communication
Small Group Research, August 1, 2005; 36(4): 499 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]