Communication Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalman, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Heino, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Communication Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 125-154 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650202029002002
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Motivations to Resolve Communication Dilemmas in Database-Mediated Collaboration

Michael E. Kalman

SSC San Diego

Peter Monge

Univeristy of Southern California

Janet Fulk

University of Southern California

Rebecca Heino

University of Southern California

In organizational settings, a communication dilemma exists whenever the interests of a collective (i.e., team, organization, interorganizational alliance) demand that people share privately held information, but their individual interests instead motivate them to withhold it. This article develops and tests an expectancy model that predicts specific conditions under which collective benefits can be made to converge with private ones, thus resolving communication dilemmas and motivating voluntary contributions to a collectively shared database. In the model, motivation is a multiplicative function of individual-level attitudes and beliefs: (a) organizational commitment; (b) organizational instrumentality, an instrumentality that links successful collective information sharing to broader organizational gain; (c) connective efficacy, an expectation that information contributed to the database will reach other members of the collective; and (d) information self-efficacy, the self-perceived value of a contributor's information to other database users. The model was tested by a survey administered to members of an intact work team using a discretionary database. The multiplicative model was significant and explained sizeable amounts of variance in the motivation to contribute discretionary information. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. The model can be readily extended to predict information sharing by means of other communication media.

Key Words: collaboration • collective action • communication dilemma • expectancy theory • game • information sharing • motivation • organizational commitment • social dilemma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Y. C. Yuan, J. Fulk, and P. R. Monge
Access to Information in Connective and Communal Transactive Memory Systems
Communication Research, April 1, 2007; 34(2): 131 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
U. Cress, J. Kimmerle, and F. W. Hesse
Information Exchange With Shared Databases as a Social Dilemma: The Effect of Metaknowledge, Bonus Systems, and Costs
Communication Research, October 1, 2006; 33(5): 370 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
G. Jian and L. W. Jeffres
Understanding Employees' Willingness to Contribute to Shared Electronic Databases: A Three-Dimensional Framework
Communication Research, August 1, 2006; 33(4): 242 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]