Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Althaus, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tewksbury, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Agenda Setting and the "New" News

Patterns of Issue Importance Among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of the New York Times

Scott L. Althaus

David Tewksbury

This study examines whether readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper acquire different perceptions of the importance of political issues. Using data from a weeklong experiment in which subjects either readthe print version of the New York Times, the online version of that paper, or received no special exposure, this study finds evidence that people exposed to the Times for 5 days adjusted their agendas in response to that exposure and that print readers modified their agendas differently than did online readers.

Communication Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 180-207 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650202029002004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. Lecheler, C. de Vreese, and R. Slothuus
Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects
Communication Research, June 1, 2009; 36(3): 400 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
I. Huck, O. Quiring, and H.-B. Brosius
Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 139 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Young Mie Kim
Issue Publics in the New Information Environment: Selectivity, Domain Specificity, and Extremity
Communication Research, April 1, 2009; 36(2): 254 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
Young Mie Kim
How Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations Interact in Selectivity: Investigating the Moderating Effects of Situational Information Processing Goals in Issue Publics' Web Behavior
Communication Research, April 1, 2007; 34(2): 185 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
T. Takeshita
Current Critical Problems in Agenda-Setting Research
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2006; 18(3): 275 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
S. Kiousis
Compelling Arguments and Attitude Strength: Exploring the Impact of Second-Level Agenda Setting on Public Opinion of Presidential Candidate Images
International Journal of Press/Politics, April 1, 2005; 10(2): 3 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]