Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scharrer, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Third-Person Perception and Television Violence

The Role of Out-Group Stereotyping in Perceptions of Susceptibility to Effects

Erica Scharrer

The third-person perception as it relates to the issue of television violence is examined here via survey responses of 624 adults from three regions in the United States. Rather than being asked about generally defined groups of "others," respondents were instructed to specify which social/demographic groups they deemed more susceptible to negative television influence than others. Social categorization and social identity theories as well as the concept of negative out-group stereotyping are used to explain results that provide preliminary support that some social groups (e.g., children and teens, those with less education, and those with less income) are perceived as more likely to be negatively influenced by television violence than others. The relationship between estimates of groups' susceptibility to effects and respondents' thirdperson perception is also tested.

Communication Research, Vol. 29, No. 6, 681-704 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/009365002237832


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. B. Oliver, H. Yang, S. Ramasubramanian, J. Kim, and S. Lee
Exploring Implications of Perceived Media Reinforcement on Third-Person Perceptions
Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 745 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
Y. Y. Choi, G. Leshner, and J. Choi
Third-Person Effects of Idealized Body Image in Magazine Advertisements
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 147 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
P. C. Meirick
Rethinking the Target Corollary: The Effects of Social Distance, Perceived Exposure, and Perceived Predispositions on First-Person and Third-Person Perceptions
Communication Research, December 1, 2005; 32(6): 822 - 843.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. Huh, D. E. Delorme, and L. N. Reid
The Third-Person Effect and its Influence on Behavioral Outcomes in a Product Advertising Context:: The Case of Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising
Communication Research, October 1, 2004; 31(5): 568 - 599.
[Abstract] [PDF]