This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stephenson, M. T. Articles by Holbert, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Monte Carlo Simulation of Observable Versus Latent Variable Structural Equation Modeling Techniques

R. Lance Holbert

In this study, three approaches commonly used by communication scientists to specify structural relationships using full-information maximum likelihood structural equation modeling are investigated. Specifically, a simulation study using Monte Carlo techniques was conducted to compare the structural paths generated by each of the three structural equation model types. Two of the three approaches utilized forms of latent variable modeling, and the third approach employed observed variables only. Of the three, the observed variable approach produced the most conservative structural path coefficients, whereas the hybrid latent variable approach generated the least attenuated coefficients. The appropriateness of each technique in modeling structural relationships is discussed and an argument is made for greater use of latent variable structural equation modeling in the field of communication.

Key Words: structural equation model • latent variable • Monte Carlo • media effects • media exposure

Communication Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, 332-354 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650203030003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Zhao Media Use and Global Warming Perceptions: A Snapshot of the Reinforcing Spirals Communication Research, October 1, 2009; 36(5): 698 - 723. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Morgan, M. T. Stephenson, T. R. Harrison, W. A. Afifi, and S. D. Long Facts versus `Feelings': How Rational Is the Decision to Become an Organ Donor? J Health Psychol, July 1, 2008; 13(5): 644 - 658. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. L. Quick and M. T. Stephenson Further Evidence That Psychological Reactance Can Be Modeled as a Combination of Anger and Negative Cognitions Communication Research, June 1, 2007; 34(3): 255 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. Pan, L. Shen, H.-J. Paek, and Y. Sun Mobilizing Political Talk in a Presidential Campaign: An Examination of Campaign Effects in a Deliberative Framework Communication Research, October 1, 2006; 33(5): 315 - 345. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Mortenson, M. Liu, B. R. Burleson, and Y. Liu A Fluency of Feeling: Exploring Cultural and Individual Differences (and Similarities) Related to Skilled Emotional Support Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2006; 37(4): 366 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. P. Martens Future Directions of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology The Counseling Psychologist, May 1, 2005; 33(3): 375 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Holbert Political Talk Radio, Perceived Fairness, and the Establishment of President George W. Bush's Political Legitimacy International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 12 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]