| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Face Concerns in Interpersonal ConflictA Cross-Cultural Empirical Test of the Face Negotiation Theory
This study sought to test the underlying assumption of the face-negotiation theory that face is an explanatory mechanism for cultures influence on conflict behavior. A questionnaire was administered to 768 participants in 4 national cultures (China, Germany, Japan, and the United States) asking them to describe interpersonal conflict. The major findings of this study are as follows: (a) cultural individualism-collectivism had direct and indirect effects on conflict styles, (b) independent self-construal related positively with self-face and interdependent self-construal related positively with other-face, (c) self-face related positively with dominating conflict styles and other-face related positively with avoiding and integrating styles, and (d) face accounted for all of the total variance explained (100% of 19% total explained) in dominating, most of the total variance explained in integrating (70% of 20% total explained), and some of the total variance explained in avoiding (38% of 21% total explained) when considering face concerns, cultural individualismcollectivism, and self-construals.
Key Words: interpersonal conflict cross-cultural communication conflict styles self-construals face theory
Communication Research, Vol. 30, No. 6,
599-624 (2003) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||

