Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Shifting Journalistic Paradigms

How China’s Journalists Assess "Media Exemplars"

Zhongdang Pan

Joseph Man Chan

This study examines shifting journalisticparadigms in a transitional society. Analyzing data from surveys of journalists and journalism students in the People’s Republicof China, the authors find that professional journalism has emerged as a direct competitor to the party-journalism paradigm. Although the former is manifested in journalists’ positive appraisal of professional news media, the latter is embodied in praising the official party organs. The professional perspective is associated with emphasis on the disseminator role of the media and the desire for more liberal arts training in journalism, whereas the party-journalism paradigm is related to the emphasis on the interpretive and popular advocacy roles and the desire for more training in communist propaganda. The two journalistic paradigms are also reflected in differences in evaluating various innovative media outlets in the reforms. The implications of the findings for studies on the articulation of professionalism and other journalism paradigms are discussed.

Key Words: journalistic paradigms • professionalism • media exemplars • media reforms • Chinese media

Communication Research, Vol. 30, No. 6, 649-682 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650203257843


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
C.-C. Lee, Zhou He, and Yu Huang
Party-Market Corporatism, Clientelism, and Media in Shanghai
International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2007; 12(3): 21 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
J. M. Chan, F. L.F. Lee, and Z. Pan
Online news meets established journalism: how China's journalists evaluate the credibility of news websites
New Media Society, December 1, 2006; 8(6): 925 - 947.
[Abstract] [PDF]