This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Meirick, P. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Topic-Relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance

Political Advertising and First- and Third-Person Effects

Department of Communication at the University of Oklahoma

This article argues for using topic-relevant reference groups in examining first and third-person effects. It also proposes using topic-relevant dimensions of distance to assess relationships not only between self and target groups but also relationships both have with communicators. The study showed 2000 presidential primary ads from Al Gore and George W. Bush to a combined sample of student and nonstudent partisans (N = 140). Participants perceived greater effects on the out-group and on the general public then on themselves for ads from the out-group candidate. A third-person effect was also observed for ads from the in-group candidate in self-in-group and self-public comparisons. The only first-person effect was found for the self-out-group comparison of responses to the in-group candidate ads. Self-candidate political distance, an analogue of message desirability, was negatively related to perceived effects on self and target groups, whereas self-group and group-candidate distance measures showed only sporadic relationships to perceived effects.

Key Words: third-person effect • first-person effect • social distance • reference groups • self-enhancement

Communication Research, Vol. 31, No. 2, 234-255 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650203261514


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Huck, O. Quiring, and H.-B. Brosius Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 139 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Oliver, H. Yang, S. Ramasubramanian, J. Kim, and S. Lee Exploring Implications of Perceived Media Reinforcement on Third-Person Perceptions Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 745 - 769. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Jensen and S. Collins The Third-Person Effect in Controversial Product Advertising American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 225 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Huh and R. Langteau Presumed Influence of DTC Prescription Drug Advertising: Do Experts and Novices Think Differently? Communication Research, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 25 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. C. Meirick Rethinking the Target Corollary: The Effects of Social Distance, Perceived Exposure, and Perceived Predispositions on First-Person and Third-Person Perceptions Communication Research, December 1, 2005; 32(6): 822 - 843. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-J. Paek, Z. Pan, Y. Sun, J. Abisaid, and D. Houden The Third-Person Perception as Social Judgment: An Exploration of Social Distance and Uncertainty in Perceived Effects of Political Attack Ads Communication Research, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 143 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]