Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berger, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Slippery Slopes to Apprehension:

Rationality and Graphical Depictions of Increasingly Threatening Trends

Charles R. Berger

Department of Communication, University of California, Davis

Two experiments examined the interactive effects of rational thinking style and variations in the slopes of threatening trends on individuals’ judgments. In Experiment 1, individuals read news stories containing graphical depictions of linearly increasing rates of campus theft. Apprehension, problem seriousness, and perceived risk of theft victimization judgments were made in response to three different slopes (shallow, moderate, and steep). High rationals demonstrated less apprehension and more attenuated problem seriousness judgments, and high rationals’ judgments showed greater variabilityin response to the slope variations than did those of the low rationals. Experiment 2 employed a linear and two nonlinear functions with identical initial and final values. Results for Experiment 2 were consistent with those of Experiment 1. High rationals appear more likely to heed cues that serve to reduce the amount of apprehension they experience in response to graphically presented information about increasingly threatening trends.

Key Words: graphical depictions • threatening trends • rationality • apprehension

Communication Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, 3-28 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650204271397


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
C. R. Berger
A Tale of Two Communication Modes: When Rational and Experiential Processing Systems Encounter Statistical and Anecdotal Depictions of Threat
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2007; 26(3): 215 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
C. R. Berger and E.-J. Lee
Dynamic Representations of Threatening Trends: The Role of Rationality and Experientiality in Potentiating Trepidation
Communication Research, February 1, 2007; 34(1): 53 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]