Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsfati, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Democratic Legitimacy

The Case of Gaza Settlers

Yariv Tsfati

Jonathan Cohen

Department of Communication, University of Haifa, Israel.

In this article, we examine the notion that perceptions of strong influence of biased media coverage may indirectly lead to an increased willingness to resort to violent protest. We test this idea on a sample of Jewish settlers in the Gaza Strip (N = 413), in the dramatic context of a Likud party vote on Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to pull out from the Gaza Strip, which includes a proposed evacuation of the settlers from their homes. Findings show that perceptions of influence of biased media coverage of the settlements on Israeli public opinion were associated with perceptions of the negative image of the settlements in Israeli public opinion, which in turn had an impact on the justification of violent resistance to the likely evacuation. The perceived image of the settlements, resulting from presumed media influence, also affected settlers' political inefficacy and their thoughts about residential mobility.

Key Words: third-person effect • settlers • political violence • political protest • presumed media influence

Communication Research, Vol. 32, No. 6, 794-821 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650205281057
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
A. C. Gunther, N. Miller, and J. L. Liebhart
Assimilation and Contrast in a Test of the Hostile Media Effect
Communication Research, December 1, 2009; 36(6): 747 - 764.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
J. Cohen and Y. Tsfati
The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Strategic Voting
Communication Research, June 1, 2009; 36(3): 359 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
J. Cohen and G. Weimann
Who's Afraid of Reality Shows?: Exploring the Effects of Perceived Influence of Reality Shows and the Concern Over Their Social Effects on Willingness to Censor
Communication Research, June 1, 2008; 35(3): 382 - 397.
[Abstract] [PDF]