This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Meirick, P. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Rethinking the Target Corollary

The Effects of Social Distance, Perceived Exposure, and Perceived Predispositions on First-Person and Third-Person Perceptions

Department of Communication at the University of Oklahoma.

This study examines the effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on perceived media effects for desirable and undesirable health messages. It finds support for the effect social distance as traditionally measured; that is, groups that are more socially distant from the self, like the public, are perceived to be more affected by cigarette ads than close groups, such as friends. However, individual measures of respondents' social distance from any given comparison group generally are unrelated to perceived effects on the group. The influence of a group's perceived exposure on perceived message effects is confirmed for cigarette ads but not for desirable messages. Perceived attitudes of comparison groups toward message-relevant behaviors emerge as a factor that deserves inclusion in models of perceived effects.

Key Words: third-person effect • first-person effect • social distance • exposure • prosocial messages • stereotypes

Communication Research, Vol. 32, No. 6, 822-843 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650205281059


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Huck, O. Quiring, and H.-B. Brosius Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 139 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Oliver, H. Yang, S. Ramasubramanian, J. Kim, and S. Lee Exploring Implications of Perceived Media Reinforcement on Third-Person Perceptions Communication Research, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 745 - 769. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Ran Wei, V.-H. Lo, and H.-Y. Lu Third-Person Effects of Health News: Exploring the Relationships Among Media Exposure, Presumed Media Influence, and Behavioral Intentions American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 261 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Wexler and D. Feldman Letter by Wexler and Feldman Regarding Article, "Ethnic and Gender Differences in Ambulatory Blood Pressure Trajectories: Results From a 15-Year Longitudinal Study in Youth and Adults" Circulation, May 22, 2007; 115(20): e477 - e477. [Full Text] [PDF]