This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Knobloch, L. K. Articles by Theiss, J. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Role of Intimacy in the Production and Perception of Relationship Talk Within Courtship

Department of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, 244 Lincoln Hall, 702 S. Wright St., Urbana, IL 61801; phone: 217-333-8913; fax: 217-244-1598 knobl{at}uiuc.edu

Denise Haunani Solomon

Pennsylvania State University

Jennifer A. Theiss

Rutgers University

The authors define relationship talk as content messages that reference the nature of the relationship between people. They seek to contribute to the literature by (a) conceptualizing relationship talk in ways that attend to its nuances, and (b) evaluating how intimacy predicts the production and perception of relationship talk. They conducted an observational study of conversations between 120 dating couples. Length of romantic interest, compared to intimacy, was the more proximal predictor of the prominence, explicitness, depth, and negative valence of relationship talk. In general, relationship talk was positively associated with people's perceptions of the relational impact of conversation, but intimacy was unrelated to relational impact. The prominence of relationship talk noted by third-party judges was positively associated with relational impact when intimacy was low but not high. The authors discuss how their findings illuminate content messages about relationships.

Key Words: intimacy • relationship talk • conversation • courtship

Communication Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, 211-241 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650206289148


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?