|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Media Interaction
Jan-Erik Nordlund
Umea University
In order to analyse "person-to-person" involvement in mass media content between an audience member and a "media personality," the concept of media interaction, which implies that the audience member experiences "interaction" with, and in many cases identifies with persons in the media content, was defined, operationalized and used in an empirical study. Guiding the empirical analysis was a model of individual mass media use which brings together: (1) those social/psychological structures that affect need fulfillment possibilities, relating these to (2) mass media exposure, and (3) media interaction, and ending with (4) some consequences of the latter. The results shown how media interaction can be related to certain characteristics of the audience member's individual and social situation as well as to certain patterns regarding consumption of various types of media fare. The results also indicate that media interaction may possibly lead to increased dependency on the mass media as well as to tendencies to use the media, as opposed to other sources of "company," at times of loneliness.
Communication Research, Vol. 5, No. 2,
150-175 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/009365027800500202

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Auter, M. Arafa, and K. Al-Jaber
Identifying with Arabic Journalists: How Al-Jazeera Tapped Parasocial Interaction Gratifications in the Arab World
International Communication Gazette,
April 1, 2005;
67(2):
189 - 204.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Park and S. J. Lennon
Television Apparel Shopping: Impulse Buying and Parasocial Interaction
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
June 1, 2004;
22(3):
135 - 144.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Cole and L. Leets
Attachment Styles and Intimate Television Viewing: Insecurely Forming Relationships in a Parasocial Way
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
August 1, 1999;
16(4):
495 - 511.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Leets, G. De Becker, and H. Giles
Fans: Exploring Expressed Motivations for Contacting Celebrities
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
March 1, 1995;
14(1-2):
102 - 123.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. CANARY and B. H. SPITZBERG
Loneliness and Media Gratifications
Communication Research,
December 1, 1993;
20(6):
800 - 821.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. GRANT, K. K. GUTHRIE, and S. J. BALL-ROKEACH
Television Shopping: A Media System Dependency Perspective
Communication Research,
December 1, 1991;
18(6):
773 - 798.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. PERSE and R. B. RUBIN
Attribution in Social and Parasocial Relationships
Communication Research,
February 1, 1989;
16(1):
59 - 77.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. ELLIS, S. K. STREETER, and J. D. ENGELBRECHT
Television Characters as Significant Others and the Process of Vicarious Role Taking
Journal of Family Issues,
June 1, 1983;
4(2):
367 - 384.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Becker and D. C. Whitney
Effects of Media Dependencies: Audience Assessment of Government
Communication Research,
January 1, 1980;
7(1):
95 - 120.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|