Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Submit your manuscript through SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stauffer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rybolt, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

News

Literacy, Illiteracy, and Learning From Television News

John Stauffer

Babson College

Richard Frost

Babson College

William Rybolt

Babson College

This paper reports on an investigation of the abilities of literates and adult nonreaders to recall and use information from a national network television news program. On a test of unaided recall of news stories the literates recalled 55% more stories than the nonreaders. On a multiple-choice test of information gain from the news program, the literates performed 63% better than the nonreaders. The samples were found to be virtually identical in their use of and opinions about television news. A control group of college students was given the information test without first seeing the news program and did no better than chance.

The most important factor affecting recall was the length of time the story was on the air. Human interest stories were recalled much better by both groups than any other type of story. The level of performance among the adult nonreaders correlated highly with their reading levels.

Communication Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, 221-232 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/009365027800500205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. E. GRABE, A. LANG, S. ZHOU, and P. D. BOLLS
Cognitive Access to Negatively Arousing News: An Experimental Investigation of the Knowledge Gap
Communication Research, February 1, 2000; 27(1): 3 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
C. GAZIANO
THE KNOWLEDGE GAP: An Analytical Review of Media Effects
Communication Research, October 1, 1983; 10(4): 447 - 486.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
L. B. Becker and D. C. Whitney
Effects of Media Dependencies: Audience Assessment of Government
Communication Research, January 1, 1980; 7(1): 95 - 120.
[Abstract]