Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmgreen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rayburn, J.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Uses and Gratifications and Exposure To Public Television

A Discrepancy Approach

Philip Palmgreen

University of Kentucky

J.D. Rayburn

University of Kentucky

A consistent problem with uses and gratifications research has been the failure to distinguish between gratifications sought and gratifications obtained. This study tested a discrepancy model constrasting gratifications sought from television in general with gratifications respondents perceived they obtained (or would obtain) from public television. The model successfully predicted level of exposure to PTV content among respondents who made their own decisions concerning what programs to watch. Level of exposure was unrelated to the discrepancy measure among those who let others make the viewing decision. When each gratification was considered individually, the discrepancy model successfully discriminated between viewers and nonviewers of PTV on 8 of 11 gratification items. The results also indicate the importance of social determinants of the viewing decision and perceptions of PTV content as predictors of PTV consumption.

Communication Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, 155-179 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/009365027900600203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GazetteHome page
B.-h. Hwang and Z. He
Media Uses and Acculturation Among Chinese Immigrants in the USA: A Uses and Gratifications Approach
International Communication Gazette, February 1, 1999; 61(1): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CommunicationHome page
G. Weimann, H.-B. Brosius, and M. Wober
TV Diets: Towards a Typology of TV Viewership
European Journal of Communication, December 1, 1992; 7(4): 491 - 515.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. DOBOS
Gratification Models of Satisfaction and Choice of Communication Channels in Organizations
Communication Research, February 1, 1992; 19(1): 29 - 51.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
A. M. RUBIN and E. M. PERSE
Audience Activity and Television News Gratifications
Communication Research, February 1, 1987; 14(1): 58 - 84.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. W. STANFORD
PREDICTING FAVORITE TV PROGRAM GRATIFICATIONS FROM GENERAL ORIENTATIONS
Communication Research, October 1, 1984; 11(4): 519 - 536.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. D. RAYBURN II and P. PALMGREEN
MERGING USES AND GRATIFICATIONS AND EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY
Communication Research, October 1, 1984; 11(4): 537 - 562.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
L. A. WENNER
GRATIFICATIONS SOUGHT AND OBTAINED IN PROGRAM DEPENDENCY: A Study of Network Evening News Programs and 60 Minutes
Communication Research, October 1, 1982; 9(4): 539 - 560.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
P. PALMGREEN and J. D. RAYBURN II
GRATIFICATIONS SOUGHT AND MEDIA EXPOSURE An Expectancy Value Model
Communication Research, October 1, 1982; 9(4): 561 - 580.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
C. R. BANTZ
EXPLORING USES AND GRATIFICATIONS: A Comparison of Reported Uses of Television and Reported Uses of Favorite Program Type
Communication Research, July 1, 1982; 9(3): 352 - 379.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. V. Leuven
Expectangy Theory in Media and Message Selection
Communication Research, October 1, 1981; 8(4): 425 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
P. Palmgreen, L. A. Wenner, and J. D. Rayburn II
Gratification Discrepancies and News Program Choice
Communication Research, October 1, 1981; 8(4): 451 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
A. M. Rubin
An Examination of Television Viewing Motivations
Communication Research, April 1, 1981; 8(2): 141 - 165.
[PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
P. Palmgreen, L. A. Wenner, and J.D. Rayburn
Relations Between Gratifications Sought and Obtained: A Study of Television News
Communication Research, April 1, 1980; 7(2): 161 - 192.
[Abstract]