This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Weaver, D. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Audience Need for Orientation and Media Effects

Indiana University

Using data from a political campaign study conducted in Syracuse, New York, this article tests Blumler's argument that audience motives should be considered in uses and gratifications studies which seek to predict media influence processes. The primary research question addressed here is whether the general cognitive motive of need for orientation (a combination of political interest and uncertainty) is a better predictor of media exposure- media effects relationships than are individual political gratifications, par ticularly the surveillance gratifications. The findings tend to support Blum ler's (1979) proposal that we need to turn to basic audience orientations to predict and explain media influence processes. They also suggest that perhaps future studies of media uses and effects should move toward more general measures of audience motives and away from the more specific gratification measures which have been employed in past uses and gratifi cations studies

Communication Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, 361-373 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/009365028000700305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Kolmer and H. A. Semetko Framing the Iraq War: Perspectives from American, U.K., Czech, German, South African, and Al-Jazeera News American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2009; 52(5): 643 - 656. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Stromback Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2008; 13(3): 228 - 246. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Takeshita Current Critical Problems in Agenda-Setting Research Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2006; 18(3): 275 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Schoenbach and E. Lauf The "Trap" Effect of Television and Its Competitors Communication Research, October 1, 2002; 29(5): 564 - 583. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Ohr and P. R. Schrott Campaigns and Information Seeking: Evidence from a German State Election European Journal of Communication, December 1, 2001; 16(4): 419 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. DIMMICK, S. KLINE, and L. STAFFORD The Gratification Niches of Personal E-mail and the Telephone: Competition, Displacement, and Complementarity Communication Research, April 1, 2000; 27(2): 227 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. ROESSLER The Individual Agenda-Designing Process: How Interpersonal Communication, Egocentric Networks, and Mass Media Shape the Perception of Political Issues by Individuals Communication Research, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 666 - 700. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. Hesse Cross-Border Mass Communication from West to East Germany European Journal of Communication, June 1, 1990; 5(2): 355 - 371. [Abstract]

				D. K. PERRY Implications of a Contextualist Approach to Media-Effects Research Communication Research, June 1, 1988; 15(3): 246 - 264. [Abstract]