Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leuven, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Expectangy Theory in Media and Message Selection

Jim Van Leuven

University of Idaho

New broadcasting technologies give audience members more control over the mass communication process than previously assumed. This article argues for reversing the traditional emphasis on uses and gratifications research in favor of a single expectancy theory capable of handling media and message selection processes at once. The two-stage expectancy value model here is adapted from Vroom's valence andbehavioral choice models. holding that the likelihood of selecting a particular medium depends o n the expectation that the choice will be followed by a message of interest, and on the importance of that message in satisfying the user's most important personal values. If implemented, the model would provide a n avenue for comparing value profiles of target audiences to see how different message categories appear to specialize in the enhancement of certain values. As a result. by comparing ditferences between message values and personal ones. social policymakers are given a tool for measuring the "media welfare" of different audience subgroups.

Communication Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 425-434 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/009365028100800402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. DOBOS
Gratification Models of Satisfaction and Choice of Communication Channels in Organizations
Communication Research, February 1, 1992; 19(1): 29 - 51.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. D. RAYBURN II and P. PALMGREEN
MERGING USES AND GRATIFICATIONS AND EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY
Communication Research, October 1, 1984; 11(4): 537 - 562.
[Abstract]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
P. PALMGREEN and J. D. RAYBURN II
GRATIFICATIONS SOUGHT AND MEDIA EXPOSURE An Expectancy Value Model
Communication Research, October 1, 1982; 9(4): 561 - 580.
[Abstract]