Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Huge, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Opinions as Norms

Applying a Return Potential Model to the Study of Communication Behaviors

Carroll J. Glynn

The Ohio State University

Michael E. Huge

The Ohio State University

This research investigates the impact of normative intensity (i.e., strength of feeling) and crystallization (i.e., level of agreement) regarding communication behaviors and perceptions of social sanctions. By adapting the return potential model originally set forth by Jay Jackson, the authors examine perceptions of communication behaviors as a normative opinion process. Telephone survey respondents were asked to offer their own personal opinions regarding several communicative behaviors. By calculating the normative power (NP = Normative Intensity x Crystallization) associated with each of these behaviors, predictions were made regarding the frequency of behavior. The authors also connect normative power with the social costs ascribed to acts falling outside the accepted realm of behavior. Results indicate that public opinion can be seen as a normative process in which the intensity and crystallization of the climate of opinion exert influence on behavior in various communication situations.

Key Words: public opinion • injunctive norms • descriptive norms • opinion climate • return potential model

References

  • Baumeister, R.F., DeWall, C.N., Ciarocco, N.J., & Twenge, J.M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 589-604.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulliten, 117(3), 497-529.[CrossRef]
  • Berkowitz, A.D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research, and annotated bibliography. Retrieved December 8, 2005, from http://www.edc.org/hec/socialnorms
  • Blumer, H. (1946). Collective behavior. In A. M. Lee (Ed.), New outlines of the principles of sociology. New York: Barnes & Noble.
  • Christensen, P.N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W., & Matz, D.C. (2004). Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1295-1309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., & Reno, R.R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Crandall, C.S., Eshleman, A., & O'Brien L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359-378.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Gastil, J., & Dillard, J.P. (1999). Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication, 16, 3-23.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Glynn, C.J. (1989) Perceptions of others' opinions as a component of public opinion. Social Science Research, 18, 53-69.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Glynn, C.J. (1997). Public opinion as a normative opinion process. Communication Yearbook, 20, 157-183.
  • Glynn, C.J., Ostman, R.E., & McDonald, D.G. (1995). Opinions, perceptions and social reality. In T. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 249-280). New York: Guilford.
  • Gonzenbach, W.J. (1992). The conformity hypothesis: Empirical consideration for the spiral of silence's first link. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 633-645.[Web of Science]
  • Hogg, M.A., & Reid, S.A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7-30.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hogg, M.A., Turner, J.C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77-100.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Jackson, J.M. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 301-309). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Jackson, J.M. (1975). Normative power and conflict potential. Sociological Methods and Research, 4, 237-263.
  • Lapinski, M.K., & Rimal, R.N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127-147.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Larimer, M.E., & Neighbors, C. (2003). Normative misperception and the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms on college student gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(3), 225-243.
  • Moy, P., Domke, D., & Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 7-25.
  • Nail, P.R. (1986). Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 603-627.
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1977). Turbulences in the climate of opinion: Methodological applications of the spiral of silence theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 143-158.[Web of Science]
  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—our social skin (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Price, V., & Allen, S. (1990). Opinion spirals, silent and otherwise. Communication Research, 17, 369-391.[Free Full Text]
  • Price, V., & Oshagan, H. (1995). Social-psychological perspectives on public opinion. In T. Glaser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 177-206). New York: Guilford.
  • Price, V., Cappella, J.N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19, 95-112.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Price, V., Nir, L., & Capella, J.N. (2006). Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, 16, 47-74.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B. & Kallgren, C.A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104-112.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rimal, R.N., Lapinski, M.K., Cook, R.J., & Real, K. (2005). Moving toward a theory of normative influences: How perceived benefits and similarity moderate the impact of descriptive norms on behaviors. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 433-450.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rimal, R.N., & Real, K. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13(2), 184-203.[Web of Science]
  • Rimal, R.N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms. Communication Research, 32(3), 389-414.[Abstract]
  • Scheufele, D.A., Shanahan, J., & Lee, E. (2001). Real talk: Manipulating the dependent variable in spiral of silence research. Communication Research, 28(3), 304-324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Trockel, M., Williams, S., & Reis, J. (2003). Considerations for more effective social norms based alcohol education on campus: An analysis of different theoretical conceptualizations in predicting drinking among fraternity men. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 550-559.
  • Wilnat, L., Lee, W.P., & Detenber, B.H. (2002). Individual-level predictors of public outspokenness: A test of the spiral of silence theory in Singapore. International Journal of Public Opinion Resesarch, 14(4), 391-412.[CrossRef]

Communication Research, Vol. 34, No. 5, 548-568 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650207305236
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Huge, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?