Communication Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goei, R.
Right arrow Articles by Carlyle, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Communication Research, Vol. 34, No. 6, 575-595 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650207307896

The Effects of Favor and Apology on Compliance

Ryan Goei

University of Minnesota Duluth

Anthony Roberto

The Ohio State University

Gary Meyer

Marquette University

Kellie Carlyle

Arizona State University

This study was designed to test the effects of favor and apology on compliance and to explain any potential effect via indebtedness, gratitude, and liking. Two experiments were devised to accomplish these ends. In the first experiment favor and apology were varied in the absence of a transgression to see if apologizing for not providing a favor can be used proactively to increase compliance. In the second experiment favor and apology were varied in a more common scenario, following a transgression. Results show that favor has a positive effect on compliance mediated by gratitude when using a general prosocial request and by liking when using a more altruistic request. Results also suggest that apology has a positive effect on liking and that apology has an indirect effect on compliance under certain conditions.

Key Words: favor • apology • compliance • reciprocity • persuasion

References

  • Abrahams, M.F., & Bell, R.A. (1994). Encouraging charitable contributions: An examination of the three models of door-in-the-face compliance. Communication Research, 21, 131-153.[Abstract]
  • Ames, D.R., Flynn, F.J., & Weber, E.U. (2004). It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 461-474.[Abstract]
  • Bennett, M., & Dewberry, C. (1994). "I've said I'm sorry, haven't I?" A study of the identity implications and constraints that apologies create for their recipients. Current Psychology: Development, Learning, Personality, Social, 13, 10-20.
  • Boster, F.J., Fediuk, T., & Kotowski, M.R. (2001). The effectiveness of an altruistic appeal in the presence and absence of favors. Communication Monographs, 68, 340-346.[CrossRef]
  • Boster, F.J., Rodriguez, J.I., Cruz, M.G., & Marshall, L. (1995). The relative effectiveness of a direct request message and a pregiving message on friends and strangers. Communication Research, 22, 475-484.[Abstract]
  • Brehm, J.W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
  • Burger, J.M., Soroka, S., Gonzago, K., Murphy, E., & Somervell, E. (2001). The effect of fleeting attraction on compliance to requests. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1578-1586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Carnevale, P.J., Pruitt, D.G., & Carrington, P.I. (1982). Effects of future dependence, liking, and repeated requests for help on helping behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 9-14.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Cialdini, R.B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Frenzen, J.K., & Davis, H.L. (1990). Purchasing behavior in embedded markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 1-12.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Goei, R., & Boster, F.J. (2005). The roles of obligation and gratitude in explaining the effectiveness of favors on compliance. Communication Monographs, 72, 284-300.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Goei, R., Lindsey, L.L.M., Boster, F.J., Skalski, P.D., & Bowman, J.M. (2003). Reconsidering the effects of favors and liking on compliance. Communication Research, 30, 178-197.[Abstract]
  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper Colophon.
  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Greenberg, M.S., Block, M.W., & Silverman, M.A. (1971). Determinants of helping behavior: Person's rewards versus other's costs. Journal of Personality, 39, 79-93.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Greenberg, M.S., & Frisch, D.M. (1972). Effect of intentionality on willingness to reciprocate a favor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 99-111.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Greenberg, M.S., & Shapiro, S.P. (1971). Indebtedness: An adverse aspect of asking for and receiving help. Sociometry, 34, 290-301.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Hunter, J.E., & Gerbing, D.W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis and causal models. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 267-320). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Kiesler, S.B. (1966). The effect of perceived role requirements on reactions to favor-doing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 198-210.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Kim, P.H., Ferrin, D.L., Cooper, C.D., & Dirks, K.T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 104-118.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Marwell, G., & Schmidt, D.R. (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30, 350-364.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • McCabe, K.A., Rigdon, M.L., & Smith, V.L. (2003). Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 267-275.[CrossRef]
  • McCullough, M.E., Kilpatrick, S.D., Emmons, R.A., & Larson, D.B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 249-266.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Nelson, W.R., Jr. (2002). Equity or intention: It is the thought that counts. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48, 423-430.[CrossRef]
  • Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219-227.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Okamoto, S., & Robinson, W.P. (1997). Determinants of gratitude expressions in England. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 411-433.[ISI]
  • Reeder, G.D., Vonk, R., Ronk, M.J., Ham, J., & Lawrence, M. (2004). Dispositional attribution: Multiple inferences about motive-related traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 530-544.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Regan, D.T. (1971). Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 627-639.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Schlenker, B.R., & Darby, B.W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 271-278.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Schopler, J., & Thompson, V.D. (1968). Role of attribution processes in mediating amount of reciprocity for a favor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 243-250.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Skarlicki, D.P., Folger, R., & Gee, J. (2004). When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 322-341.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments (6th ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon. (Original work published 1790)
  • Whatley, M.A., Webster, J.M., Smith, R.H., & Rhodes, A. (1999). The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 251-259.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Wilke, H., & Lanzetta, J.T. (1970). The obligation to help: The effects of amount of prior help on subsequent helping behavior Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 488-493.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Williamson, G.M., Clark, M.S., Pegalis, L.J., & Behan, A. (1996). Affective consequences of refusing to help in communal and exchange relationships Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 34-47.[ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goei, R.
Right arrow Articles by Carlyle, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?