|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Impact of Exemplars on Responsibility Stereotypes in Fund-Raising Letters
Hans Hoeken
Radboud University
Lettica Hustinx
Radboud University
Exemplars are capable of influencing perceptions of reality in newspaper contexts. Can exemplars in fund-raising letters also influence the responsibility stereotype of the group funds are raised for and the effectiveness of these letters? In three experiments, 679 participants received a fund-raising letter containing an exemplar that was or was not held responsible for the trouble he or she was in. In all experiments, the responsibility perception of the group as a whole was influenced by the exemplar manipulation. If the group members were held responsible for the trouble they were in, participants were less inclined to donate money unless the trouble was considered very severe. The study shows how exemplars influence responsibility stereotypes and the persuasiveness of fund-raising letters.
Key Words: exemplars fund-raising persuasion responsibility stereotypes
References
- Benoit, W.L. (1998). Forewarning and persuasion. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion. Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 139-154). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
- Borchert, J., & Rickabaugh, C.A. (1995). When illness is perceived as controllable: The effects of gender and mode of transmission on AIDS-related stigma. Sex Roles, 33, 657-668.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Brosius, H.B. (2001). Toward an exemplification theory of news effects. Document Design, 2, 18-27.
- Brosius, H.B., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communication. Communication Research, 21, 48-78.[Abstract]
- Coats, S., & Smith, E.R. (1999). Perceptions of gender subtypes: Sensitivity to recent exemplar activation and in-group/out-group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 515-526.[Web of Science]
- Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D. (1994). Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: Perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research, 21, 603-624.[Abstract]
- Hamill, R., Wilson, T.D., & Nisbett, R.E. (1980). Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 578-589.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Henry, P.J., Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2004). Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 34-58.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1983). Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 15, 127-142.
- Lord, C.G., & Lepper, M.R. (1999). Attitude representation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advacnes in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 265-343). San Diego, CA: Academic.
- Lord, C.G., Paulson, R.M., Sia, T.L., Thomas, J.C., & Lepper, M.R. (2004). Houses built on sand: Effects of exemplar stability on susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 733-749.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- O'Keefe, D.J. (2002). Persuasion. Theory and research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Quinn, J.M., & Wood, W. (2004). Forewarnings of influence appeals: Inducing resistance and acceptance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 193-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Reyna, C. (2000). Lazy, dumb, and industrious: When stereotypes convey attribution information in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 85-110.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Reyna, C., Henry, P.J., Korfmacher, W., & Tucker, A. (2005). Examining the principles in principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 109-128.[Web of Science]
- Rudolph, U., Roesch, S.C., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2004). A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 815-848.[CrossRef]
- Sia, T.L., Lord, C.G., Blessum, K.A., Ratcliff, C.D., & Lepper, M.R. (1997). Is a rose always a rose? The role of social category exemplar—change in attitude stability and attitude—behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 501-514.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Sia, T.L., Lord, C.G., Blessum, K.A., Thomas, J.C., & Lepper, M.R. (1999). Activation of exemplars in the process of assessing social category attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 517-532.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Sigall, H., & Mills, J. (1998). Measures of independent variables and mediators are useful in social psychology experiments: But are they necessary? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 218-226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Smith, E.R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 391-445). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Smith, E.R., & Zarate, M.A. (1992). Exemplar-based models of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3-21.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Strange, J.J., & Leung, C.C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social's problem urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 436-449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Weiner, B. (1980). A (cognitive) attribution—emotion—action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of help-giving behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186-200.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness. A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957-965.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility. A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
- Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Weiner, B., Perry, R.P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738-748.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wood, W., & Quinn, J.M. (2003). Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analytic syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 119-138.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H.B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Communication Research, Vol. 34, No. 6,
596-617 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0093650207307898

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|