|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Framing Policy Debates: Issue Dualism, Journalistic Frames, and Opinions on Controversial Policy Issues
Nam-Jin Lee*,
Douglas M. McLeod,
and
Dhavan V. Shah
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: namjinlee{at}wisc.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This study examines how the news frames that journalists use to present contentious policy debates shape reasoning processes and opinion outcomes. Drawing on the notion that framing is a cognitive process in which the message affects how individuals weigh existing considerations (i.e., political orientations and relevant attitudes/beliefs) to make a judgment, the authors conducted two experiments in which they presented participants with news stories in which policy conflicts were described as either a clash of underlying values and principles (i.e., a value frame) or as a clash of political interests and strategies (i.e., a strategy frame). The results suggest that the framed news stories failed to change issue opinions directly but did alter the importance of the considerations used to make judgments on relevant issues. Specifically, individuals tend to react to strategy frames by discounting partisan affiliation as a primary consideration, turning to other salient alternatives when making judgments.
First published on August 4, 2008, doi:10.1177/0093650208321792
Communication Research 2008;35:695.
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
